Let’s stay in touch!
Loved what you read today? Let’s stay in touch – we’ll send you an update when we post new stories and case studies on our website.
2023 TaskS for 2040 Net-Zero
As of mid-2022, 702 companies on the Forbes 2000 have made net-zero pledges. Whether your organization has made a pledge or plans to make one soon, there’s a massive difference between pledging net-zero and achieving it. Do you have a clear roadmap for your sustainability journey? What are the right steps to consider in 2023 to achieve 2040 net-zero carbon, water, and waste goals? It’s time to create a clear roadmap.
The metric that will give context to your total emissions as your business and carbon footprint both expand.
With consumers increasing pressure on companies to deliver more value while simultaneously reducing emissions, how can you set goals to reduce your carbon emissions when your business—and therefore carbon footprint—is expanding? Many organizations only look at total emissions, measured in Scope 1 (direct), 2 (indirect), and 3 (everything else in the supply chain), when setting and tracking emissions reduction goals. But there’s another metric that more accurately reflects improved business processes that reduce the amount of carbon emitted per product or unit even as total emissions increase.
That metric is emissions intensity, often measured in kilograms (kg) or grams (g) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emitted per product. Water intensity and energy intensity can also be measured in this way, depending on which environmental impacts are material for your business. Another benefit of using emissions intensity is that it makes these numbers more relatable to consumers.
What Is Carbon Emissions Intensity?
Carbon emissions intensity refers to the emissions attributed to a facet of an organization’s operations. It’s calculated by dividing the total emissions by a metric of an operation, such as the number of products/units produced, the number of full-time equivalent employees, or the square footage of building(s). So if you’re making a product, emissions intensity might be in kg or g of CO2e per item that you manufactured. Or if you are an office-only type of operation, and your footprint is limited to the emissions associated with your office, carbon intensity might be measured in terms of full-time employee equivalents or emissions per square foot.
Why Does Carbon Emissions Intensity Matter?
Emissions intensity will vary from operation to operation, but it’s a really important way of relating emissions to where an organization is at scale. Companies that have set targets have likely set some sort of target around overall emissions. For example, a target to reach net zero by 2040. However, something that’s important to consider is that as an organization grows, its overall carbon footprint could also grow, particularly in the absence of energy efficiency projects.
For example, an organization might add a second or third facility or new suppliers, and even if they’ve done efficiency projects, they might still see an increase in emissions. There are various reasons for this. Maybe they’re now operating 24/7 whereas they used to only operate five days a week. Or maybe they’ve added new carbon-emitting equipment to their operations or have increased fuel consumption. Whatever the case, overall emissions could continue to grow as an organization grows, depending on what’s being done to mitigate those emissions.
Conversely, if you are working towards decarbonizing, your emissions intensity could actually go down as you scale up since emissions intensity accounts for your overall emissions in relation to your increased production or increased scale. So, in addition to total emissions targets, it can be helpful also to set emissions intensity targets. Carbon intensity gives context to total emissions by relating those emissions to a tangible product or unit.
BeatBox Emissions Intensity Case Study
Here is a chart showing BeatBox’s 2021 emissions, including the carbon intensity per carton of party punch. On the left you’ll see their total carbon footprint for Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. Since BeatBox actually uses a co-packer, in their case, the bulk of their emissions is in Scope 3, with total emissions measuring just over 6,800 metric tons of CO2e.
For consumers of products, a metric ton is really hard to visualize. (Even for people working in carbon accounting, it’s hard to visualize a metric ton). But when carbon emissions can be related in terms of the end-user product or service, it’s much easier to digest. In the case of BeatBox, they have an emissions intensity of 445 g of CO2e per carton of party punch.
As mentioned above, the concept of emissions intensity is not just important from a progress-tracking perspective. It’s actually also a really important tool to relate to consumers and help them really understand the impacts of this thing that they’re consuming.
Most of the organizations we encounter know they need to measure their total carbon emissions, but it’s not typically common knowledge what emissions intensity is or why it matters. If you’re unsure how to measure your organization’s emissions intensity or have other questions, reach out to our climate services team to learn more today.
Carbon emissions intensity refers to the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted per unit of economic output or activity. It can be measured in a variety of ways, such as CO2 emissions per unit of gross domestic product (GDP), CO2 emitted per passenger-kilometer traveled, or CO2 emitted per liter of beverage produced by a company. For example, a beverage company might measure the carbon emissions intensity of its products by calculating the amount of CO2 emitted per liter of beverage produced.
Carbon emissions intensity is important because it allows us to measure progress in reducing carbon emissions, even as total emissions may continue to increase. By reducing emissions intensity, countries and companies can become more environmentally sustainable and reduce their impact on climate change. For example, if a company’s total carbon emissions increased over a certain period, but its emissions intensity decreased during that same period, it would indicate that the company is becoming more efficient and reducing its carbon footprint.
Reducing carbon emissions intensity can be achieved through various methods. One way is to increase energy efficiency, such as improving the energy efficiency of buildings, transportation, and industrial processes. By doing so, less energy is required to produce the same amount of economic output, resulting in lower carbon emissions intensity. Another method is to switch to renewable energy sources like wind, solar, and hydropower. These renewable energy sources produce fewer carbon emissions compared to using fossil fuels, hence reducing carbon emissions intensity. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies are also helpful in reducing carbon emissions intensity by capturing carbon emissions from industrial processes and storing them underground, reducing the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere. Overall, reducing carbon emissions intensity requires a combination of policy, technology, and behavioral changes.
About the Author
Nicole Sullivan is the Director of Climate Services at CarbonBetter. When she’s not working on sustainability reports and helping clients to decarbonize, she’s busy reading about the environment or is outdoors exploring it. Connect with her on LinkedIn and drop her a line to let her know what you thought about these stories and share what you’re reading.
SXSW Recap: Brands Shaking Up Alcohol’s Carbon Footprint
Highlights from our recent SXSW panel featuring leaders from brands that are shaking up alcohol’s carbon footprint.Read More
Permanence Considerations When Buying Carbon Credits
Defining permanence, including how it’s measured, and how to balance permanence with other considerations and co-benefits when buying carbon credits.Read More
David Koweek | Modern Planeteer
As a trained marine and Earth systems scientist, David drives innovative ocean-based climate solutions for a sustainable future.Read More